Search by property
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- AP-083 + (Recorded as T.T. 6-7. These two periods are very close together but exact information is not quite possible. Unsurprisingly.)
- AP-094 + (Recorded as T.T. 6. No distinct mention of being from within the Burnt Structure but hopefully contemporaneous.)
- AP-010 + (Recorded as T.T. Platform 6-7. S.side. There is no mention of a platform in the reports but the artefact can be assumed to be either immediately below or part of T.T.6.)
- AP-057 + (Recorded as: (AK. Road. B-1m.). AK is prob … Recorded as: (AK. Road. B-1m.). AK is probably T.T.5 but there are no clear records of where this is meant to be except the report says 'Area. T.T.5. (A.K.)' so is presumable similar. T.T.5 is a very disturbed level between the abandonment of the Halaf settlement and the Ubaid levels. Stylistically very typically ArpMid.vels. Stylistically very typically ArpMid.)
- AP-053 + (Recorded as: (AK. W.end. Subsurface, above … Recorded as: (AK. W.end. Subsurface, above main road to AK). AK is probably T.T.5 but there are no clear records of where this is meant to be except the report says 'Area. T.T.5. (A.K.)' so is presumable similar. T.T.5 is a very disturbed level between the abandonment of the Halaf settlement and the Ubaid levels. Is stylistically ArpMidthe Ubaid levels. Is stylistically ArpMid)
- AP-062 + (Recorded as: (Loose in soil AK). AK is pro … Recorded as: (Loose in soil AK). AK is probably T.T.5 but there are no clear records of where this is meant to be except the report says 'Area. T.T.5. (A.K.)' so is presumable similar. T.T.5 is a very disturbed level between the abandonment of the Halaf settlement and the Ubaid levels. Stylistically very typically ArpMid.vels. Stylistically very typically ArpMid.)
- AP-064 + (Recorded as: (Loose in soil AK. Road B). A … Recorded as: (Loose in soil AK. Road B). AK is probably T.T.5 but there are no clear records of where this is meant to be except the report says 'Area. T.T.5. (A.K.)' so is presumable similar. T.T.5 is a very disturbed level between the abandonment of the Halaf settlement and the Ubaid levels. Stylistically difficult, an obsidian disk with strange piercings. Probably a bead, provisionally ArpMidngs. Probably a bead, provisionally ArpMid)
- AP-049 + (Recorded as: Akropolis (AK) -1m Central Si … Recorded as: Akropolis (AK) -1m Central Side. Pre-Al-Ubaid level. AK is probably T.T.5 but there are no clear records of where this is meant to be except the report says 'Area. T.T.5. (A.K.)' so is presumable similar. T.T.5 is a very disturbed level between the abandonment of the Halaf settlement and the Ubaid levels. Mallowan and Rose record it as Pre-Al-Ubaid and typologically it fits so it has been assigned to ArpMid.it fits so it has been assigned to ArpMid.)
- AP-015 + (Recorded as: Akropolis (AK), West-Central, … Recorded as: Akropolis (AK), West-Central, Surface. Pre-Al-Ubaid level. AK is probably T.T.5 but there are no clear records of where this is meant to be except the report says 'Area. T.T.5. (A.K.)' so is presumable similar. T.T.5 is a very disturbed level between the abandonment of the Halaf settlement and the Ubaid levels. Mallowan and Rose record it as Pre-Al-Ubaid and typologically it fits so it has been assigned to ArpMid.it fits so it has been assigned to ArpMid.)
- UK-045 + (Reputedly from Tell Khanzir which is a settlement in Syria. No context essentially, assigned to KhaburEarly morphologically although this design is found across time.)
- AP-138 + (See von Wickede reference. G is the least recorded of the trenches with a single comment about 2 bowls found at 1.1m. Stylistically the inter-twinned snakes are Uruk so von Wickede's designation will be followed.)
- AP-137 + (See von Wickede reference. G is the least recorded of the trenches with a single comment about 2 bowls found at 1.1m. Stylistically Uruk so von Wickede's designation will be followed.)
- AP-134 + (See von Wickede reference. G is the least recorded of the trenches with a single comment about 2 bowls found at 1.1m. Stylistically Uruk so von Wickede's designation will be followed.)
- AP-133 + (See von Wickede reference. G is the least recorded of the trenches with a single comment about 2 bowls found at 1.1m. Stylistically Uruk so von Wickede's designation will be followed.)
- UK-048 + (Stylistically ambiguous so assigned KhaburEarly. The artefact was purchased in the Jaghjagh without any more detail.)
- UK-047 + (Stylistically typically Halaf so assigned KhaburHalaf, but the artefact was purchased in the Jaghjagh without any more detail.)
- UK-046 + (Stylistically typically Halaf so assigned KhaburHalaf, but the artefact was purchased in the Jaghjagh without any more detail.)
- AP-192 + (T.T. Surface is a problematic area argued … T.T. Surface is a problematic area argued as Ubaid by Mallowan but containing considerable amounts of Uruk pottery. This sealing was assigned by Wickede, see references, as dating to the late Uruk where it has stylistic parallels. It has been taken as ArpVeryLate.rallels. It has been taken as ArpVeryLate.)
- AP-149 + (T.T.2 is towards the top of the mound and argueable happily Ubaid. Von Wickede again defines the sealing as Uruk however and his judgement is again followed.)
- AP-197 + (T.T.2 is towards the top of the mound and argueable happily Ubaid. Von Wickede again defines the sealing as Uruk however and his judgement is again followed.)
- AP-022 + (T.T.5 is very messy, but morphology of this artefact is unusual but the design typically Halaf. As such ArpMid with some reservations.)
- AP-006 + (T.T.7 directly underlies T.T.6 and elements of T.T.6 overlapped T.T.7 so likely very similar in date.)
- AP-068 + (The West extension of trench E is also ambiguous but appears at -2m to have contained 'bread ovens' of Halaf period levels. No further contextual information is available with no mention of the bread ovens in association with anything artefactual.)
- AP-146 + (The West extension of trench E is also ambiguous but appears at -2m to have contained 'bread ovens' of Halaf period levels. No further contextual information is available with no mention of the bread ovens in association with anything artefactual.)
- AP-037 + (The West extension of trench E is also ambiguous but appears at -1.7m to have contained 'bread ovens' of Halaf period levels. No further contextual information is available with no mention of the bread ovens in association with anything artefactual.)
- AP-039 + (The West extension of trench E is also amb … The West extension of trench E is also ambiguous but appears at -3m to have contained 'bread ovens' of Halaf period levels. No further contextual information is available with no mention of the bread ovens in association with anything artefactual. A child burial is mentioned at -3m but with no mention of associated amulets (except a flint knife).associated amulets (except a flint knife).)
- AP-124 + (The West extension of trench E is also amb … The West extension of trench E is also ambiguous but appears at -3m to have contained 'bread ovens' of Halaf period levels. No further contextual information is available with no mention of the bread ovens in association with anything artefactual. A child burial is mentioned at -3m but with no mention of associated amulets (except a flint knife).associated amulets (except a flint knife).)
- AP-102 + (The West extension of trench E is also ambiguous but appears at -1.9m to have contained 'bread ovens' of Halaf period levels. No further contextual information is available with no mention of the bread ovens in association with anything artefactual.)
- AP-072 + (The West extension of trench E is also amb … The West extension of trench E is also ambiguous but appears at -2.5-3m to have contained 'bread ovens' of Halaf period levels. No further contextual information is available with no mention of the bread ovens in association with anything artefactual. A child burial is mentioned at -3m but with no mention of associated amulets (except a flint knife).associated amulets (except a flint knife).)
- AP-026 + (This artefact is from Gogjeli and the only … This artefact is from Gogjeli and the only contextual information is that it was associated with Halaf pottery. This makes contextualisation difficult as the morphology, though not the design, is also very unusual. Have assigned to ArpMid but the certainty of this designation is limited.certainty of this designation is limited.)
- AP-090 + (Trench C is very poorly recorded but contained the stone roads which are Halaf in this section and a 'tholos ossuary' with temenos chamber. Presumable ArpMid becuase of the depth but without stylistic information this designation is highly provisional.)
- AP-009 + (Trench C is very poorly recorded but contained the stone roads which are Halaf in this section and a 'tholos ossuary'. The location is also problematic but is likely between D and F which would suggest the artefact is also ArpMid.)
- AP-025 + (Trench C is very poorly recorded but contained the stone roads which are Halaf in this section and a 'tholos ossuary'. The location is also problematic but is likely between D and F which would suggest the artefact is also ArpMid.)
- AP-063 + (Trench C is very poorly recorded but contained the stone roads which are Halaf in this section and a 'tholos ossuary' with temenos chamber. Very hard to assign a period to this one but stylistically Halaf so put in ArpMid)
- AP-082 + (Trench C is very poorly recorded but contained the stone roads which are Halaf in this section and a 'tholos ossuary' with temenos chamber. Very hard to assign a period to this one but stylistically Halaf so put in ArpMid)
- AP-193 + (Trench C-D is the junction between C and D … Trench C-D is the junction between C and D. This places it close to where an ambiguous pot was recorded possible of Ubaid or Halaf type (1.3m). However this context comes from von Wickede who also interprets the artefact as Uruk. The design is very unclear and without more convincing contextual information the designation ArpVeryLate will be given.he designation ArpVeryLate will be given.)
- AP-139 + (Trench D is again ambiguous and no mention of the upper levels is provided. Stylistically Uruk, as von Wickede argues, so in ArpVeryLate.)
- AP-140 + (Trench D is again ambiguous and no mention of the upper levels is provided. Stylistically Uruk, as von Wickede argues, so in ArpVeryLate.)
- AP-004 + (Typed record records T.T. Terrace W. Side, … Typed record records T.T. Terrace W. Side, hand-written appears to say T.T. Trenches W. Side but is pretty illegible. There is no record of a terrace in any part of T.T. This artefact is typologically is typically Halaf so has been assumed to come from ArpMid.f so has been assumed to come from ArpMid.)
- CB-012 + (Very early in the Chagar Bazar sequence this artefact is either Halaf or Pottery Neolithic. Assigned as KhaburHalaf.)
- UK-043 + (Very interesting stylistically. Assigned KhaburEarly stylistically, but the artefact was purchased in the Jaghjagh without any more detail.)
- UK-044 + (Very interesting stylistically. Assigned KhaburHalaf stylistically, but the artefact was purchased in the Jaghjagh without any more detail.)
- AP-021 + ({T.T.6 Under house, outside tholos} Presumable from T.T.7 as T.T.6 does not contain a Tholos. As such ArpMid.)